![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's still intersting that they chose the America. In addition to
being ships campany on the America I made 3 cruises on the USS Midway with CCG-3 Staff, did pre-deployment work-ups on the USS Coral Sea, USS Hancock and the USS Ranger (74-76). During 68-69 I made cruises on the USS Kitty Hawk and the USS Constellation as part of CCG-5/CTF-77. Of all those ships the Ranger was the worst. Not operationally but materially. Evedy time we left the pier we went on water hours. Coral Sea was suppose to be in terrible shape. There were rtumors, and IIRC an artile in a SanDiego papers, that she was in such terrible shape that you could stomp real hard a punch a hole in her hull throught the rust. Of course she made several deployments after that and was still steaming up until the day they decommissioned her. IMHO the USS Midway was the best. We did an exercise with the Enterprises once and launched more planes with two cats than she could launch with four.But then Midway was a full time carrier. All the carriers deployed to Japan were and are full time carriers. But in the end I suspect the America, having not gone through SLEP, was in the worst material condition. I'll add one thing, who will bet that the Kitty Hawk is not preserved? Walt On Mon, 23 May 2005 11:01:40 -0700, "Mike Kanze" wrote: Walt & others, Unfortunately, and as much as we would otherwise prefer, it is not possible to save each and every one of these great ships. The costs of such endeavors are daunting and an unforeseen turn of events (like 9/11's impact on tourism) can easily overwhelm even the best-founded preservation and exhibition plans. One need look no farther than the troubles the Aircraft Carrier Hornet Foundation is currently experiencing. My own feeling is that we are probably doing well if we are able to preserve one or at most two of each class of these great ships. Beyond that, the economics become very dicey, IMHO. I can certainly understand and sympathize with everyone who has seen any ship on which they have served come to its end, especially if that ship holds memories of camaraderie and jobs well done. In my own case, every ship on which I have ever served or just visited is either razor blades (USS CORAL SEA (CV-43), USS SYLVANIA (AFS-2)), reposing in Davy Jones' Locker (USS BRAINE (DD-630): sold to Argentina and later expended as an Exocet target), or awaiting its ultimate fate (USS RANGER (CV-61): stricken from the Naval Vessel Register last year). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE..... | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 19 | October 24th 03 07:51 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |