![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The MD500/M530/600 series share the OH-6 lineage. At least a few of
those have been sold commercially since the MDHI split. MDHI sold some MDExplorers to the Mexican Navy, and some paramilitary versions in Europe. The rotor system on the MELB was developed for the commercial MD530F. That's the point - the civil and military markets and technologies are complementary. The Europeans didn't just buy militarized versions of civil aircraft to improve their balance sheet. They developed dual-use aircraft to fill their requirements from a domestic source. With a full product line, Eurocopter can sell military or commercial as the markets shift. No, I don't expect a commercial Tiger derivative, but giving Australia a commercial helicopter assembly factory helped get that country to buy the Tiger. Technology development in military and civil helicopters is interdependent. Rotor, transmission, HUMS, and other advancess carry over from one market to the other. The flaw tolerance in the commercial S-92 makes a very safe, crashworthy military helicopter (The VXX competition chose to ignore that.) Commercial innovations -- HUMS, on-condition maintenance -- can cut O&S costs for military operators. Light helicopers have no future? Boeing abandoned the product line it now needs to compete for a sizeable US Army order. It may have also pushed itself out of the LUH contest. Tell me how that was smart business. HW |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |