![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gary Drescher wrote: wrote in message ... An emergency is not limited to the aircraft having a mechanical or similar such problem. Violating Class B airspace has unknown ramifactions, such as perhaps approach control seeing the intrustion and declaring an emergency on your flight because of loss of separation, etc., etc. It's true that a controller *might*, for additional reasons, deem a Class B incursion to be an emergency. But I doubt that a slight breach of Class B, with good visibility and no conflicting traffic, would *by itself* constitute an emergency. So I don't think 91.3b would necessarily come into play. Again, I don't dispute that you should avoid the incursion, even if you have to violate 91.123b. I just wish the FARs weren't contradictory on that point. --Gary I cited both 91 (a) and (b). If just (a) fits in your judgment, then that's your judgment. You will have a far greater chance of avoiding the enforcement hearing if you remain clear of the Class B. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
World Class: Recent Great News | Charles Yeates | Soaring | 58 | March 19th 04 06:58 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
One Design viability? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 41 | December 10th 03 03:27 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |