![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Antonio.. if the ATC has not violated you.. do not have an issue to
resolve.. BT "Antoņio" wrote in message oups.com... Gary Drescher wrote: I don't think there's anything in the FARs themselves that would let a pilot conclude that following ATC instructions is secondary to complying with the other FARs. That's not the way analogous situations work when driving a car, for example; there, police directives do take precedence over the traffic laws that would otherwise hold (even though there are other, implicit exceptions of the sort you mentioned; e.g. if you're instructed to stop your car ten feet above the pavement, you presumably can't be penalized for failing to comply). --Gary Well said and exactly my dilema which, as yet, is unresolved. Antonio |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sports class tasking | [email protected] | Soaring | 12 | April 25th 05 01:32 PM |
Class III vs. Class II medical | G. Sylvester | Piloting | 11 | February 8th 05 06:41 PM |
One Design viability? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 41 | December 10th 03 03:27 AM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |
RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Owning | 77 | December 3rd 03 09:10 PM |