![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helowriter wrote:
Hate to tell you, but the commercial 609 is still quite alive, and Bell claims an order backlog. Bell market studies a couple of years back projected 45% of the small tilt rotor market would be US and foreign governments. Whatever the origins of the Apache composite blade, going back to the AH-64B, MSIP, etc. the technology to make the things got a chance in a commercial development - 530F. That's how these things sometimes work, and denying yourself a commercial avenue denies you development opportunities that pay off later. Would Boeing Mesa have been better just learning how to make the Apache blade from scratch today? Flaw tolerance does indeed equate to ruggedness - the margins to tolerate flaws caused by damage and keep flying. That is a good thing for any helicopter - military or civil. HW Flaw tolerance is the ability to recover from something going wrong (back-up systems, automatic reset, etc.). Ruggedness is the ability to avoid it altogether (armor, maneuverability, "dropability", etc.). If you've ever dealt with a military helicopter procurement spec, the two are separate and defined in detail in the requirements. Origins of the composite blade were the whole point of your argument. The composite blades for the Apache have always been in development - despite not having a commercial operation. The fact that the blades were first used on a 530 (outgrowth from a military program) certainly doesn't mean that blade development was dependent upon having a civil use for it, first. Blade development for Apache was and is developed from scratch - it didn't stop because of the sale to MDHI nor did it originate with a commercial program. What development opportunities has Boeing denied itself by not having a commercial rotary wing venture? AH-64B? So, Bell claims to have a backorder for the 609? Who has bought it? Firm orders or wish list? When does the first one get delivered? Commercial, now, not V-22. I haven't seen anything in the press on any 609 sales. Vygg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |