![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vygg wrote:
Helowriter wrote: Hate to tell you, but the commercial 609 is still quite alive, and Bell claims an order backlog. Bell market studies a couple of years back projected 45% of the small tilt rotor market would be US and foreign governments. Whatever the origins of the Apache composite blade, going back to the AH-64B, MSIP, etc. the technology to make the things got a chance in a commercial development - 530F. That's how these things sometimes work, and denying yourself a commercial avenue denies you development opportunities that pay off later. Would Boeing Mesa have been better just learning how to make the Apache blade from scratch today? Flaw tolerance does indeed equate to ruggedness - the margins to tolerate flaws caused by damage and keep flying. That is a good thing for any helicopter - military or civil. HW Flaw tolerance is the ability to recover from something going wrong (back-up systems, automatic reset, etc.). Ruggedness is the ability to avoid it altogether (armor, maneuverability, "dropability", etc.). If you've ever dealt with a military helicopter procurement spec, the two are separate and defined in detail in the requirements. Origins of the composite blade were the whole point of your argument. The composite blades for the Apache have always been in development - despite not having a commercial operation. The fact that the blades were first used on a 530 (outgrowth from a military program) certainly doesn't mean that blade development was dependent upon having a civil use for it, first. Blade development for Apache was and is developed from scratch - it didn't stop because of the sale to MDHI nor did it originate with a commercial program. What development opportunities has Boeing denied itself by not having a commercial rotary wing venture? AH-64B? So, Bell claims to have a backorder for the 609? Yes, see below. Who has bought it? Firm orders or wish list? The former, apparently. This list (from FlugRevue) is a bit old, but indicative of the kind of firms/individuals who planned to buy it: In March 2003, Bell said there were "nearly 70 advance orders” from 40 customers in 18 countries. In July 2001, Bell had claimed 80 orders from 42 different customers in 18 countries, apparently down from the November 2000 figures of 83 aircraft from 44 customers in 23 countries. At the Farnborough Air Show in September 1998, Bell had put the total at 68 aircraft from 40 customers in 17 countries. Buyers identified at one time or another a Aero-Dienst GmbH (Germany) Aero Gulf Service (Dubai) AeroValls (Andorra) Air Center Helicopters Inc. (USA): 2 Austin Jet (USA) Bristow (UK): 2 Canadian Helicopter Corp. (Canada): 2 Don Carter Evergreen Helicopters (USA) Form Air (Turkey) Helicopter Services (Norway): 2 Helitech DTY Ltd. (Australia) Hillwood Development (Ross Perot jr., USA) Wayne Huizenga Lider (Brazil): 3 Loyd´s Investments (Poland) Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance (USA) Mitsui (Japan): 3, announced at the Asian Aerospace in February 1998 Greg Norman (USA) Northern Mountain Helicopters Inc. (Canada) Petroleum Helicopters (USA). Petroleum Tiltrotors International (Sheikh Sultan Mohammed Bin Al Shaikh Mejeren, Dubai): 2 Textron Inc. (USA) United Industries (South Korea) IIRR, a deposit of $100,000 was required at the time the a/c made its first flight, which was about 2 years ago. When does the first one get delivered? Commercial, now, not V-22. IIRR, Certification is scheduled for the 4th Qtr of 2008 (IIRC it was originally scheduled for 2003). Bell put the 609's development on hold for a couple of years while they straightened out the MV-22, not for technical reasons but because they figured that it was necessary for PR (or if you like, confidence-building) for commercial sales, and because they needed the cash to take care of the MV-22 and AH-1/UH-1 upgrade development. I haven't seen anything in the press on any 609 sales. AvLeak has covered the a/c a fair amount, as have other sources. Here's a site which I think is fairly current: http://www.aerospace-technology.com/projects/ba609/ or you can go to Bell's own website. Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |