![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kevin Horton" wrote in message
news ![]() On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 00:22:46 +0000, Tilt wrote: We would like the craft to have some light aerobatics abilities. Nothing real heavy...none of us wants to go off and join the Air Show. Cheers, Lyle Lyle, If you also want to fly some aerobatics, I don't think you should belooking at a canard. A properly designed, built and loaded canardaircraft does have stall protection if the stall is approached gentlyenough. But, if you have a very dynamic entry to the stall (e.g. verynose high at low speed) you might stall the main wing. If the main wingever stalls you will quite likely enter an unrecoverable deep stall. I would not risk doing aerobatics in a canard aircraft. You might getaway with it for awhile, but if you ever screw up and stall the main wing,you have to bail out. With a conventional aircraft, you just centralizethe controls and wait until the aircraft enters a recognizable attitude,or recover from the spin. I recall a canard that was lost on a test flight up here in Canada when the test pilot tried some aerobatics. See: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...ews.ionsys.com This one is also interesting: http://www.canard.com/ntsb/LAX/95A289.htm There were quite a few Velocity accidents due to stalls in the early days. They made changes, and I think the issue is gone, but it highlights how bad a cliff edge there can be with stalls in canards. http://www.canard.com/ntsb/MIA/88A203.htm http://www.canard.com/ntsb/MIA/93A011.htm http://www.canard.com/ntsb/MIA/89A087.htm http://www.canard.com/ntsb/MIA/89A117.htm -- Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit) Ottawa, Canada http://go.phpwebhosting.com/~khorton/rv8/ http://www.canard.com/ntsb/LAX/95A289.htm I won't dispute that there have been some accidents in canard airplanes during aerobatic flight. I am confident that I could find an equal number of accidents that happened during aerobatic flight in most any other make and model, high-performance homebuilt. Flown properly, aerobatics can be done in canard airplanes. They are very low drag airplanes and great care should be exercised in the vertical mode. I have done most any "fun" type manuvers you can name in a veri-eze and a long-ez. I have rolled a velocity a couple of times. They are all delightful flying airplanes. That said, the velocity is not really suited for that as much as it is touring. I don't have any experience with the SQ-2000 except close examination of the prototype on the ground. The wing area seems a little small for the load it is said to carry. Rick Pellicciotti http://www.belleairetours.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tailwheel question | Steve B | Aerobatics | 4 | January 30th 04 03:35 AM |
Hinges under stress - mechanical engineering type question | Corrie | Home Built | 21 | August 6th 03 08:49 AM |
question on intercoms for my new homebuilt | w b evans | Home Built | 1 | July 23rd 03 12:57 AM |
Canard static port location | Paul Lee | Home Built | 1 | July 12th 03 02:55 AM |
Pitts Screw Question | VTflyer | Home Built | 1 | July 2nd 03 11:02 AM |