![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Ah.... Bingo! That is it, now it makes sense. Torque is a bigger player than the increased drag and decreased lift. I can see it now. It sounds like once the aircraft gets near that point, there isn't much you could do. Every certified twin has a "V" speed, of minimum controllable airspeed with one engine out. If you are above it, you can add full power for a go around, or 1 engine takeoff, or whatever. It is the speed at which a competent pilot will have enough air going past the controls to counter the torque, and off center thrust, and increased drag, and any other thing you want to throw in. If you are going to have to decide on aborting a takeoff or go-round because of engine or prop failure, you should do so (even if it means putting it on the ground somewhere off runway) if your speed is lower than that magic number. Landing under control in trees, is even better than hitting the ground out of control. To ignore minimum controllable airspeed with an engine out, means you might get to take a long dirt nap. :-( |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
How much could I get for these back issues? | Aaron Smith | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 03 12:07 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 Control Issues | SouthBayGuy | Simulators | 22 | November 26th 03 04:31 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |