![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug" wrote in message
oups.com... In general, here is what I do. If I am being vectored, there is almost never a procedure turn. Yup, AIM 5-4-9a explicitly exempts vectoring situations from the PT requirement. If I am aligned with the FAF, then there is no sense in making a procudure turn or hold, so I go on in. It makes sense, it is safe and it works. So that is what I do. That does sound sensible (if you're at the prescribed altitude, as well as being aligned with the course); but I'm not sure if it's technically legal to skip the PT if the chart has a PT, unless you're being vectored or there's a NoPT designation for your IAF or feeder route. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Sports class tasking | [email protected] | Soaring | 12 | April 25th 05 01:32 PM |
Agent86's List of Misconceptions of FAA Procedures Zero for 15 Putz!!! | copertopkiller | Military Aviation | 11 | April 20th 04 02:17 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Instrument Approaches and procedure turns.... | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | September 18th 03 10:40 PM |