![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AMEN.
I like to think "Whatever floats your boat" when I hear folks talk about turning off the GPS so as to avoid using it as a crutch. I'm 100% on my GPS and only track VORs when IMC. I do keep track of where I am on the map (I tend to use WACs for my 'cleared direct' sojourns) Purists? After getting my SEL and slogging thru all that VOR work, I flew sailplanes CC for 15+ years. The first 3-5 years were pure pilotage. Dead recon doesn't work when you are circling and chasing lift but you do learn to back up your pilotage with it even in those conditions. I've been sooo lost, sooo many times, and sooo paid the price that I became pretty proficient at seat-o-pants chart based, low level, engine-less pilotage. My character was strengthened as earned confidence grew..... Then came GPS. Due to a quirk in sailplane racing rules, VORs and such were illegal but GPS was legal as soon as it came over the horizon. Early first generation GPS technology was immediately incorporated into panel mounted glide computers and those carbon fiber, laminar flow beauties once again got out ahead of the rest of GA. What was notable was how few pilots fully utilized the new tech. Most competitors had it onboard (Honey, did Foxtrot Uniform leave the chart in the car?) but just never learned to use it fully. Purists I guess but it seemeed slow to me. This "turn off the GPS" stuff seems slow to me now too as I sit in my retrograde Maule wishing I had an autopilot. Greg Farris wrote: I think Michael (or anyone else) is justified in placing his trust in the on-board wizardry. The old "what if it fails" argument is wearing thin these days, what with so much redundancy. With a panel GPS, and a handheld, a vor/dme, another Vor, Adf - and I'm just talking about an entry-level skyhawk here - your chances of screwing up are far less than using pilotage, mistaking one small town for a different one, then landing at the wrong airport . . . If you want to go "purist", and turn off the GPS in fair weather, that's great too. Personally, I have a log and map and waypoints to check, and I feel more prepared - but I honestly have trouble imagining a scenario where that preparation would make the difference between getting there or not. The plane's nav equipment is far more precise and reliable. How purist do you want to go? I fly in the US and in Europe. There, they teach you to calculate wind correction (speed and drift) in your head. It's fun to do - and surprisingly accurate - but in practical terms, it's "playing games" compared with the navigational information available to every pilot today. Greg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
Flight instructors as Charter Pilots | C J Campbell | Piloting | 6 | January 24th 04 07:51 AM |