![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cecil E. Chapman" wrote
Anyway (I'm sorry, in advance, if I'm am asking something that should be obvious) It should be but you're a student so it's OK ![]() I'm looking at the LOC Rwy 2 approach to Watsonville Municipal (California). There is a procedure turn that sits just before the 'entrance' into the localizer. How does one identify where it actually is (the beginning of the procedure turn, that is)? Does one simply fly up the localizer and when the localizer signal is lost THAT is where the location of the procedure turn sits? Well, assuming you arrived at the IAF (NALLS intersection) along one of the charted feeder routes (from SANTY intersection or SNS VOR) you turn outbound (South) on the localizer, fly a minute or so (longer if you have a headwind), and then do the procedure turn. The only requirement is that you complete the course reversal (in whatever way seems best to you and keeps you inside the protected area) and get established inbound before crossing NALLS. Now for the real question - why in the world is DME required for this approach? Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |