![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At OLM, there are LOC minima; at AST, the approach is NA if the glideslope
is inoperative, which wipes out any chance of a LOC approach. I would guess that the localizers ARE monitored, because in doing some other research I ran across the ILS at Galesburg, IL, where the ILS is NA as an alternate because the localizer is not monitored. BTW, e-mails to the address in your header bounce. Bob Gardner "Snowbird" wrote in message om... "Bob Gardner" wrote in message news:hv17b.288320$cF.89187@rwcrnsc53... I don't make the rules (g). The LOM is not required for the miss at either OLM or AST, but I think it is significant that neither ILS is approved as an alternate and both LOMs are unmonitored. Are the LOC's monitored? Bob, what happens to the ILS minimums if the LOM is OTS? No change? Thanks, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most Challenging Instrument Approaches in Western US? | Angus Davis | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | September 28th 03 09:25 AM |
"Best forward speed" approaches | Ben Jackson | Instrument Flight Rules | 13 | September 5th 03 03:25 PM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |
Suppose We Really Do Have Only GPS Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 10 | July 20th 03 05:10 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |