![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Ray Andraka wrote: The reason for the change is to comply with an initiative to prepare the ILS approaches for RNAV. Part of that initiative requires the location of the glideslope to be at an a 100' interval. Most OM's are not, and it is too expensive to move them, so Ohhhh, this must explain why HIO ILS 12 no longer uses ABATE LOM. I had assumed that the few hundred feet they tacked onto 12/30 had made it too close to the threshold (though that was obviously a stretch!). -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |