![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:42:54 GMT, Gord Beaman
wrote: Brian Whatcott wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 03:28:37 GMT, Gord Beaman wrote: Peter Clark wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:07:11 -0400, Jack Davis wrote: On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:25:15 GMT, Gord Beaman wrote: Jack Davis wrote: Huh? I've not flown a jet with a "small fuel tank in the tail". Am I missing something? -Jack Davis B737 Only on larger a/c Jack...747 have them (some at least). What I find interesting is how few people seem to know much about them, is it that they aren't used much now?... I see. Obviously you can count me among the many who didn't have a clue, and I used to fly 747s (-100 and -200). FWIW, the 400 has them. I believe the 777 and A300 are similarly equipped. From what I understand they pump to the CWT and help keep things in the trim envelope when you're near MTOW and high fuel loads. Yes, I'm certain that some (at least) of the 747's do have them but this reason isn't what I'm talking about...it seems that the Concorde article in this regard is all to do with the critical fore/aft balance and to keep the CG where they want it for different phases of flight and this post from Peter sounds similar BUT it's not what I'm referring to which is using fuel weight INSTEAD of aerodynamic trim to reduce drag for more economical cruise. Hmmmm...maybe I'm missing something: trimming near aft CG limit is aero drag favorable in sub sonic transports Brian Whatcott Yes it is IF it's done by transferring fuel aft. This has to be done ONLY at stable cruise though because it drastically reduces the fore/aft stability and requires operation of the autopilot...I understand that some a/c are unmanageable without an autopilot in this condition due to the reduced stability. But that's not what I understand stab tanks are for. With MTOW and lots of gas you are pretty heavy forward, and can be out of the acceptable takeoff trim range, so having fuel in the back helps put you back in the envelope (basically acting as ballast). As you fly off the fuel in the main tanks, you replenish with the stab tanks by pumping forward (range). They don't replace (or get used for) elevator trim. I believe the Concorde didn't have elevator trim due to the delta wing, so the only way to make adjustments was to pump the fuel around and physically shift the arm. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dutch Roll | SelwayKid | Piloting | 31 | June 19th 04 11:43 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
F35 cost goes up. | Pat Carpenter | Military Aviation | 116 | April 11th 04 07:32 PM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |
Throw a Weight in the Back? | Kirk | Piloting | 37 | July 28th 03 08:55 AM |