If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Robert M. Gary" writes:
The 182 holds more load but at a HUGE price. The 182 burns a lot of gas to go so slow. The 182 also has the standard issues with the Cont 230hp engine, few owners are able to get tops to make it to TBO. The 200hp Arrow runs the bullet proof Lyc IO-360 engine that will easily make TBO. Of course, the Arrow is really just a slower version of the Mooney, but you didn't ask that. The Arrow and Mooney cabins are the same size (almost down to the inch) although both got longer in the mid 70's. -Robert, CFI (182s,Arrows,Mooneys, etc, etc) Close. The '72 Arrow II got the fuselage extension; 5 more inches of legroom for the rear seat passengers. -Jack http://world.std.com/~jmac/Arrowprofile.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How safe is it, really? | June | Piloting | 227 | December 10th 04 05:01 AM |
Anti collision light mod for Piper Arrow 1968 model? | Frode Berg | Owning | 4 | May 20th 04 05:16 AM |
$15,000 Cash for a Cessna 152 Or Piper Tomahawk | MRQB | Aviation Marketplace | 17 | February 15th 04 12:05 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Piper Archer III or Cessna 172SP | Dale Harwell | Owning | 10 | July 15th 03 04:01 AM |