![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The way the SAR system works is that once the FAA has radar contact with
you and are providing radar services, they will continue to do so unless they are unable (due to lack of radar coverage) or you cancel them. If you fall below their radar coverage while utilizing their services, then they begin the SAR process. It goes something like this: 1) They attempt to establish radio contact. 2) They contact the FSS and the FAA issues an INREQ 3) After 15/30 mins (my memory fails me as to which # that is), an ALNOT is issued. At this time, the FAA starts calling around to airports and doing ramp checks. They also (if a flight plan was entered into the system) will start making calls to the locations listed in your flight plan. 4) If you still cannot be located, SAR agencies, such as the Civil Air Patrol, Sheriff's Office SAR teams, etc are activated. The process goes on from there. You got caught in Step 3, for which they're actually glad to catch you, even if they don't always sound it. It's much better than the alternative. Chris Jay Honeck wrote: Now that I think about it, I suppose we could have asked Flight Watch to notify Chicago Center when we could no longer hear them, but frankly it never dawned on me that Chicago really cared that much about what happened outside of their Class B airspace. First, Chicago Center doesn't give a crap what happens in the Chicago Class B. Ah, true enough. I have mistakenly been using the terms "Approach" and "Center" interchangeably in this thread. "Chicago Center" is always cooperative and helpful, and will unfailingly provide flight following all the way to Iowa City (if we're high enough, which we rarely are) if requested. "Chicago Approach" is the ATC facility in question here. They are the ones who called the Rantoul airport manager, and they are the ones who usually will not provide VFR flight following. Which is why I was (and am) so surprised that they actually took the time to call Rantoul when we lost radio contact with them. They are usually not so helpful. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights | Geoffrey Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | September 4th 09 06:31 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Piloting | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:13 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |