![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it's misleading to say that modern aircraft "must be 'helped'
into the spin". There are some circumstances when a spin entry can be made without any "odd" control inputs at all. One of my favourite exercises for my annual checkouts as a UK Basic Instructor is the spin off a simulated winch launch (only try this at height with an appropriate instructor with you!). Simulate a winch launch by diving to 90 kt and then pulling up at 45 degrees. As the speed drops to about 60 kt cry "BANG - cable break", and push over into the normal flying attitude. The moment normal attitude is reached, begin a co-ordinated turn. All will be fine for a second or so, as you are flying at reduced G. However, once the G comes back on many gliders will roll smoothly (no buffeting) into a spin so fast that there is little you can do about it (though the purpose of the exercise is to show the spin entry and then a recovery, so I've not tried reducing back pressure as the wing drops). The Puchacz is excellent for this. My understanding is that although everything looks fine, in fact you are flying below 1G stall speed (possible because of the reduced G resulting from the pushover, which is why BGA training requires you to push over beyond the normal attitude after a cable break, monitor the airspeed and not turn until a safe speed is regained). When 1G is restored the wings stall, but because you're already in a turn the down wing stalls earlier and autorotation ensues. If you think about it, an aggressive pull up into a thermal coupled with turning a little later than normal might produce similar effects. I believe there are a number of other modes of spin entry without unusual control movements, though you would need a far more experienced pilot than me to explain them. This is not to say that a glider in normal flight will depart into a spin without abuse of the controls, but I think it important to recognise that co-ordinated flight is not an *absolute* protection and to understand when extra precautions are required (and what those precautions are). wrote: Most important is recognition of prestall and initial departure. Since the spin is a product of yaw moment at departure, you can prevent a spin with coordinated controls alone. IE, modern aircraft must be "helped" into the spin. (Put another way, the vertical stabilizer creates enough yaw dampening to prevent autorotaion at stall so long no pro spin control imputs are made. Since there are two yaw controls, that would mean pro rudder or anti stick.) Thus, any prestall or initial departure that is met with a release of back pressure and use of coordinated controls to level the wings will produce the desired effect before a spin or spiral dive can develop. Even if you choose not to release back pressure, you shouldn't spin. Instead, you might find yourself in a secondary stall. The longer it takes to apply these simple actions, the less likely that it will produce an immediate remedy, as the aircraft will continue into either a spin or spiral dive. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |