![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder why there is no third-party lesson package for MSFS? The Rod
Machado lessons are helpful, but limited in scope. Amore complete package of pre-configured flights would be a useful IFR training accessory. Such a package would be like the Machado lessons in MSFS, only much more extensive, say 40 hours worth. It would follow a logical sequence to step you through all the various types and configurations of procedures, with instructor voice over and some sort of graphics in the flight analysis view. The package would come with all required graphics, charts, and plates in printable form. The entire thing could be sold or distributed as an internet download, and could probably be done quite cheaply, say $30. I know MSFS isn't the best flight model, but there are some big economic advantages to using it. Everyone and their brother owns MSFS already, so most folks would only have to buy the preconfigured flight package. The developer would be free to concentrate on the lessons and documentation. MSFS is relatively bug free, has extensive documentation and support, is updated and upgraded every year, and interoperability with new versions of Windows will never be an issue. There's a huge community of add-on planes and panels out there, so it would be easy to match your mount. The integrated ATC is well done. Speaking as a new IFR student just starting out, I don't really want to use a computer to learn to fly by reference to instruments. I'd rather do that in an airplane. What I want help with is learning all the procedural stuff and developing my situational awareness, so I'm not trying to learn how to interpret a pair of VORs and NDB at $130 an hour. I don't think the lower flight model quality is an issue there. The integrated Garmin GPS is another plus. Anyone familiar with the MSFS SDK? How hard would this be? "'Vejita' S. Cousin" wrote in message ... In article , Flying the lessons with IPT is challenging because it doesn't allow even momentary errors. If you slip up on a minor detail right at the end of the lesson, you must redo the entire lesson from the beginning. That leads to boredom and little training. I have never made it through flying "Plan A". Has anyone gotten all the way through? I wouldn't know. It has never operated long enough for me to get through more than the first few lessons. It's a piece of crap and a waste of over $300 for the pair. I've got On Top and IP Trainier (old old verisons, got them when winME was new forget verison). I basically can't run them on my new system. However, I have an old win98 system that I use for genlocking and they both work fine on it. Both programs really need to be updated to work with win32s, but they can run under winXP/win2k. It just takes a lot of playing with the settings. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |