![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Natalie" writes:
It's a little different here, because MSA is operational -- we have an altitude we can descend to as soon as we're within 25 nm. The MSA is for emergency use only. You shouldn't be relying on it for normal operations. As I mentioned in the bit you quoted, it's different up north -- in Canada, MSA *is* operational. If you are cleared for an approach and not given an explict altitude restriction, you are automatically allowed to descend to the lowest of the following (see RAC 9.3 in the Canadian AIP): (a) MEA (b) published transition or feeder altitude (c) MSA (d) 100 nm safe altitude (e) if nothing else applies, 1000 ft above the highest obstacle within 5 nm (1500 ft or 2000 ft in mountainous areas) Typically, when you're being vectored and then are cleared for an approach before you're inside the protected area, MSA will be the winner (assuming that you're within 25 nm of the IAF) -- descending to MSA was a standard part of almost every practice approach during my IFR training, especially the full-procedure ones. All the best, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The perfect approach | Capt.Doug | Home Built | 25 | December 3rd 04 03:37 AM |
Newbie Question, really: That first flight | Cecil Chapman | Home Built | 25 | September 20th 04 05:52 AM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |