![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Neil Gould wrote: That depends on how correct Eclipse is about the seat/mile costs. A full E-500 has to be cheaper to fly in than a half-full Citation. Sure it may be cheaper. But the charter market never has been a price-sensitive market; that is why jet charters are much more popular than piston charters. This is a problem that affects all operations equally. If one can reduce their capital expenses by a significant amount, that results in a higher net profit, and I have a hard time seeing how that is a Bad Thing. My point is that when capital is considered, there never has been such a thing as a "profit" anywhere in the charter industry except in the very high-end VIP market which sells ultra-security and ultra-privacy without regard to cost. The reason the charter market exists currently is that owners who already own airplanes for other reasons choose to lease them back to Part 135 operators. The owners make a profit on the leaseback but take a loss overall; that is OK since the airplanes can be justified on other grounds and the leaseback is just a bonus. In other words, no one today can go out and buy a fleet of CitationJets and make a profit chartering them; what happens is that someone who already owns such an airplane for other reasons chooses to earn some incremental money on a leaseback. The model of hundreds or thousands of Eclipse air taxis takes a different route and assumes that a charter leaseback can instead be profitable if the planes are bought strictly for leaseback, i.e. profitable considering both capital and operating costs. I propose that if iswere shown to be true then the free market will take over so many people would get into the air taxi business such that the charter price gets pushed down and once again the capital cost is not recovered in the price. In simplest form, every pilot would love to own an Eclipse if he could pay its ownership costs in full via a charter operation, no less make money on the deal. This would be so good a deal that the free market will ensure that it is not possible. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eclipse Aviation Engineering opportunities | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 2nd 05 08:31 PM |
Eclipse flies again! | Mike Murdock | Owning | 0 | January 1st 05 12:38 AM |
Eclipse 500 Direct Operating Cost | Bravo8500 | Owning | 2 | December 18th 04 03:27 AM |
Diamond Eclipse Prop | scott sher | Piloting | 1 | November 2nd 04 12:53 PM |
Eclipse Jet | john smith | Piloting | 7 | October 10th 04 02:34 AM |