![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Johnston wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:54:57 UTC, Bill Gribble wrote: As far as character is concerned, I'm pretty certain the last time I launched an ASH25 (as signaller, at least) it was on a black link. Or it would have been if that was what the pilot had asked for. Would you launch a K8 on a black link if the pilot requested it? In the old days, would you have signalled "all out" to the winch driver if the pilot requested it and despite open brakes? Would you launch a glider with a faulty back-release if the pilot said "Oh, that's OK, just launch me." I don't think /anyone/ on an airfield is entitled to overlook a clear safety risk of this sort. Ian Experience at two clubs - one uses weak links, other not. Tost weak links are expensive ,and difficult to come by in our backwater. But both clubs have pretty much the same cost on weak links. We launch our entire fleet on the Red link (although the book says some of our ships are OK for Black) In the last three yeast we have not had a single weak link failure. In both cases the wire used is 1930Mpa class C, put a knot in it (unavoidable as it has to connect to the parachute) and you have an automatic reduction in strength to under the strength of a black link. At the other club an engineer member with an enquiring mind put the various tost links specified for the club and private fleet on a tensiometer attached to a piece of wire with the standard four turn knot in it. Even the blue link survived the test. Conversely, there were a number of dangerous launch failures with the Twin Astir breaking weak links. Subsequently said club has steadfastly refused to use weak links, for many thousands of launches - with a powerful winch. Bottom line is , if you keep the speed in the correct range, and have a sane cable strength, you are unlikely to need a weak link. By the time the weak link / cable breaks your structure has already transmitted the load. Personally I prefer having a weak link in place, but I don't really believe that it helps much. -- Bruce Greeff Std Cirrus #57 I'm no-T at the address above. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |