A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Meigs now enjoyed by all!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old July 6th 05, 02:20 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Well-well, read 'em and weep:


Just slide that stack of poker chips over now:


"It was almost like they were an independent nation out there, with
**********no accountability**************
to the taxpayers," Schillerstrom said.

That has changed, he said.
The


*********** Airport Authority now collects about $6.5 million annually
in realestate taxes--about 20 percent of its $29.9 million a year
budget. **************

Over $10 from each person, child, senior, invalid, in the county-JG

None
of the property-tax revenue is used to pay airport operating costs.
Instead, the funds are used to retire debt.

The $12.8 million in long-term debt is scheduled to be paid off in
2007, at which time the property-tax levy could be cut in half, Goodwin
said.


COULD, like, maybe or if you say pretty please. Here comes a BUT, oh
a hangar for the pretty planes.


But the airport expects to borrow money to finance the construction of
a hangar addition. Goodwin said he is cautious about promising to
eliminate the need for property-tax funds until the airport is
debt-free and until a proposed high-technology research center on
airport-owned land along Roosevelt Road and Fabyan Parkway begins
generating revenues for the authority.

(SO, don't bet the kids college tuition on it. The TECH PARK
is a JOKE, miles away from the tollway and high office vacancies
already.-JG)


But for the first time, officials say, it ****appears*** that operating
revenues from hangar leases, the sale of aviation fuel and other fees
are enough to cover the day-to-day costs of running the airport.

****** Again with the APPEARS ****** do they cover or not?
Anyways, Vamanos!


(ALOT of Maybes, and It Appears)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn Piloting 110 September 28th 06 11:59 AM
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn Home Built 48 October 5th 04 11:46 AM
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn General Aviation 46 October 5th 04 11:46 AM
a brief blurb on meigs Tune2828 Piloting 0 January 20th 04 04:04 PM
Emergency landing at Meigs Sunday Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Piloting 22 August 3rd 03 03:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.