![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How much is too much over gross weight?
This issue comes up so many times, sometimes I feel like writing an overgross FAQ. The short answer is - it depends. Now for the long answer: Legal aspects: Even 1 pound over max gross is not legal, and can subject you to civil penalty - unless you have been granted some deviation. The deviaitons come in many flavors. Many light aircraft in Alaska are eligible for up to 15% increases if operated under Part 135 (obviously they fly differently under Part 91). Some STC's allow you gross weight increases with certain (often minor) modifications. Some engine change STC's come in flavors where one gives you a gross weight increase and the other does not - with the same engine. The FAA will give you a ferry permit to operate up to 20% overgross without batting an eye if you show that you understand what you're getting into. In other words - understand that gross weights are as arbitrary as speed limits - sometimes they exist for very good reasons, and may give you very little margin for error (or even none at all, or less than none), and other times they are arbitrary. It all depends on the situation. But rest assured the FAA won't see it that way. So how will you get caught? Well, you could have an accident. You could be ramp checked - but in that case the overload would have to be obvious and egregious - nobody will catch you on a 50lb overload. Put four big guys into a Cherokee 140, though, and you are advertising an overgross operation. Insurance aspects: Your insurance PRIMARILY covers you for pilot error, since that's (officially, at least) the cause of most accidents. I've had many insurance policies, and none have ever excluded coverage when operating contrary to FAR's. In other words, the idea that you're uninsured when overgross is a myth. You're covered if you are drunk, overgross, and fly into an airport without a clearance. Exemptions are clearly stated. Generally they require you to have a certificate of a certain grade, certain hours of experience, and an annual and medical that have not expired. On the other hand, if you overload and fail to get off the ground, you may have a hard time getting insurance after about the second or third time this happens, and you will pay more the first time. The slippery slope: If you fly overgross, you're breaking the rules. Where will the rulebreaking stop? The answer is really nowhere. It's like speeding - you are substituting your judgment for regulation. Once you've shown a willingness to do that, you will keep doing it when you feel it's safe to do so. That's worth thinking about, assuming you never ever break any regulations whatsoever, not only in your airplane but also in your car, on your bicycle, etc. Otherwise, that ship has already sailed and it's not a valid question. A more on-point slippery slope - if 25 pounds over is OK, what about 50? And next time 100? 200? Where does it stop? That's the valid question - and it has a valid answer, but not one you're going to like. Simple light airplanes have a single maximum gross weight - one size fits all (really one size fits nobody, because it's a compromise). The bigger and more complex the airplane gets, the less true that is. Some airplanes have zero fuel weights, because the wing attach points are a weak point in the design. Some have a maximum takeoff weight higher than the maximum landing weight, because the landing gear is a weak point in the design. Some are eligible for gross weight increases with tip tanks, provided the extra weight is fuel in the tip tanks and nothing else. And when you get all the way up to the airlines, their maximum takeoff weight depends on the runway length, the required climb gradient, and the density altitude - in other words, it's not a single number, but must be computed for every takeoff. So how much is too much? It all depends on what sets the limit. On some Cessnas, the limiting factor is being able to show the required positive rate of climb with full flaps (40 degrees). Limit flap travel to 30 degrees, and you get a 100 lb gross weight increase. Suppose you simply limit travel operationally (and don't install the hardware)? Is that OK? How about if the selector switch gets stuck in the down position? Are you protected if you stay within the rules? You only think so. The gross weight is the same at 7000 ft density altitude as it is at sea level - but at that density altitude, the plane will NOT climb with full flaps at gross. Never forget, these limitations are arbitrary - staying within them won't necessarily keep you safe, and breaking them isn't necessarily dangerous. It is possible (but not legal) for you to do the same thing the airlines do - come up with your own calculations and procedures. Sufficient data exist in the average POH to extrapolate performance curves for various operations above gross weight, so you can estimate takeoff, landing, and climb performance, compute new operational speeds, etc. You can study the design, and the available modifications and authorizations, to determine if it is performance, rather than structural integrity of some component, that limits gross weight. You can consider the nature of the flight - perhaps 3.0 positive gee limit is sufficient on a smooth VFR day. In other words - you can approach operation outside the established envelope the way a real, modern test pilot does it. Can the average private pilot do this? Will he? No, and no - and that's why the rules are what they are. They are written to the lowest common denominator. Can you learn how to do it? Probably. If you have sufficient technical background, you may do it on your own. Or someone can teach you - but who? Not this guy: I know that when I was receiving training, my instructor once had me bring 2 male adults with me to a lesson. He then had you project performance and handling characteristics by extrapolating from the POH and maybe other sources. In flight, he discussed these issues with you so you would know how to handle the situation in the future, pointing out quirks of the operation. No? He just told you to get in and go? I wish that were the exception, but it's the rule. He was teaching you how to fly overgross, and he was doing about the worst possible job of it. Yeah - you did it in that particular instance. You learned a little - mainly, you learned that operating outside the published envelope has consequences, and a bit about what they can be. But without an underlying framework for understanding, all you learned is what happens in that one specific case. Since that specific case is unlikely to be repeated exactly, you haven't really learned anything very useful. So the answer to your question of how much is too much? When the safety margin associated with the limiting factor in play under the circumstances becomes uncomfortably slim, that's too much. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Apache Alternate Gross Weight | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | July 6th 04 05:15 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
F35 cost goes up. | Pat Carpenter | Military Aviation | 116 | April 11th 04 07:32 PM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |