![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() As a contrary data point, my (Canadian Marsh/Lloyds) insurance includes an explicit requirement to stay within W&B limits to retain coverage. Which may or may not be enforcable, depending on state laws. It is true, thought, that some carrier demand in-envelope operation, and that others required the airworthiness cert to be in full force and effect, and then argue that over-weight operation voids said cert. Again, whether this latter approach would work would depend on the state. Avemco, though, specifically say that you can be over-weight and they'll still pay. And no-one has yet produce an example of *any* company failing to pay as a result of an aircraft being over-weight.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Apache Alternate Gross Weight | Jim Burns | Owning | 1 | July 6th 04 05:15 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
F35 cost goes up. | Pat Carpenter | Military Aviation | 116 | April 11th 04 07:32 PM |
Empty/Gross weight Vs. Max. Pilot weight | Flyhighdave | Soaring | 13 | January 14th 04 04:20 AM |