![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote: In particular, since the NEXRAD provided is base reflectivity, ... Not exactly true. Here's what WxWorx has to say about it (with minor paraphrasing): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WxWorx develops their own version of a composite radar picture using the 124 nm base reflectivity from each radar scan (revolution). They arbitrarily undertake compositing at a five minute interval, compositing the latest scan and going back in time so that all previous elevations are included (if there are 14 "cuts" conducted by the radar and it is currently on "cut 4", we include the latest cut, 4, then all others). The composited image from each radar is then mosaic-ed for the whole U.S. image." Each elevation scan or revolution produces a product called base reflectivity. On a 5 minute schedule, WxWorx uses the most recent scan and the previous 13 revolutions to build the composite reflectivity image. The timing is arbitrary which means that the most recent scan may be at some middle elevation. So when the timer goes off, they just dive in and grab the last scan that completed and the previous 13. Essentially they have "considered" all elevations by using this method. The color of the pixel that gets displayed on your screen depends on many factors. They look at each elevation over the last 13 revolutions (or 5 minutes) and choose the highest reflectivity value. This could have been from the latest scan or from the oldest scan. You just don't know. They do this for the entire 124 nm radius. There are other factors that I have not mentioned that may change what you see (such as clutter filtering. This is different than the composite reflectivity seen from the NWS SSR-88D display. WxWorx does not try to align itself with the Scan 1 to Scan N (called a volume coverage pattern) composite reflectivity image. Obviously this makes good sense since they are trying to be schedule driven, not product driven. In most cases, they will produce a product that is taken from two volume coverage patterns. But who cares? Each elevation is considered and they can provide the most current product. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- They refer to each scan as "base reflectivity", no matter what elevation the radar is tilted to. The point is that the colors you see in your airplane represent the highest level of all the different elevations scanned for that area. -Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WxWorx flight test | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | October 12th 03 02:54 PM |
WxWorx continued | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 27th 03 01:05 PM |
WxWorx continued | Dan Luke | Piloting | 8 | September 27th 03 01:05 PM |
(long) WxWorx arrived...(and NavAero) | Lenny Sawyer | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | September 10th 03 12:39 AM |
(long) WxWorx arrived...(and NavAero) | Lenny Sawyer | Piloting | 1 | September 10th 03 12:39 AM |