![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Prevost" wrote in message ... If I put the desired altitude in the plan, then the controller knows that I want 12500 and can tell me to "maintain VFR On Top at or below 12500". If I don't put it in, then he has to ask me what altitude I want or just arbitrarily assigns me something and then if it's not what I want we have to go through more radio exchange. How is it better to not include the altitude? An alternative clearance is issued when necessary to ensure separation from other traffic or airspace. For example, if the controller had traffic at nine thousand a proper clearance would be; "Climb to and report reaching VFR-on-top, no tops reports. If not on top at eight thousand maintain eight thousand and advise." Remember, you're just another IFR aircraft until you report reaching and are cleared to maintain VFR-on-top. To issue "maintain VFR On Top at or below 12500" the controller would have to know the tops were 11,500 or lower. Why use a restriction of 12,500? To separate from IFR traffic at 13,500 or VFR traffic at 13,000? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Duat Graphics | Slick | Piloting | 0 | January 23rd 05 01:35 PM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
DTC DUAT | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | June 5th 04 03:23 PM |
Picking Optimal Altitudes | O. Sami Saydjari | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | January 8th 04 02:59 PM |