![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So much depends on quality information about proper engine
operations, yet there appears to be little science behind the assertions. You are quite correct - there is very little science here. There is certainly a lack of solid statistical evidence. In this situation, you pretty much have to work from engineering first principles. Let's start from what is scientifically defensible: Operating 50 degrees LOP vs 50 degrees ROP (which is what many manufacturers recommend) means that: The engine runs slightly rougher. Extra vibration. The peak pressures in the cylinder (and thus transmitted to the crankshaft) are lower. Less stress on crankshaft, bearings, etc. That's about it. Everything else is rumor, conjecture, and guesswork. The slightly rougher running may in the end reduce the life of the engine more - or less - than the higher peak pressures in the cylinders. Oops, I guess we're done until an actual controlled study shows us which factor is more important. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for JPI's older software to download engine monitor data to a PC | Peter R. | Piloting | 11 | February 14th 05 08:58 PM |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 07:36 PM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |