![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Gideon wrote:
I don't understand GPSS. Why is this better than simply setting a GPS to follow a CDI, and then setting that CDI to take GPS data? They belong to different layers: - bottom layer is to keep wings level (or properly banked), - middle level is to fly a heading, - top level is to follow a track. The track following uses heading flying as the tool. The heading flying uses suitable banking as the tool. The autopilot can directly control the ailerons to get the proper bank. For setting a required banka angle several aileron movements are needed. The flying of a heading needs several bank angles to get and keep the heading. The flying of a track/radial needs several headings to follow the track. In control engineering terms, the order of a control system to directly follow a track with aileron control will be too high to be realizable. The CDI difference is what requests heading changes to follow the track, but to do it properly, the lower layers (heading control and roll control) are needed. HTH -- Tauno Voipio (MSEE, avionics specialist, CFII) tauno voipio (at) iki fi |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enroute GPS Install Cost? | Carl Orton | Owning | 3 | May 28th 05 02:26 PM |
Hours to install S-TEC?? | Frode Berg | Piloting | 1 | May 7th 04 01:54 AM |
mitchell autopilot | dave | Owning | 1 | May 5th 04 06:11 PM |
Chelton AP-3C autopilot | Kyler Laird | Owning | 0 | April 2nd 04 03:08 PM |
KAP140 Autopilot Details | News | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | October 22nd 03 02:01 AM |