![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave S" wrote in message And if "standing your
ground" results in a hold in current position until you choose to land, reverse course, or accept the offered routing, then what? I suppose anything is possible but that is highly unlikely. In any event, the proper response is to state "Unable" and then wait to see what the controller says. Most likely the controller will then offer to work with you with a hold and/or vectors around traffic that will more or less be equivalent to the route you need. Now I agree the controller might instead come back not with a terse "Potomac will not accept you" but rather "There has been a major incident and BWI is closed" or something catastrophic like that, in which case yes, landing might be your only option. But 99% of the time "Unable" will indeed prompt ATC to come up with another plan. If you declare an "emergency" then the expectation is that you will land at the nearest suitable airport. I am not at all proposing to declare an emergency. I am proposing the pilot fly his clearance and not accept any alternate clearance which he feels is unsafe. There is nothing of an emergency nature here. There is no reason the posting pilot couldn't have landed and waited the weather out. ATC would have to give me a good reason for me to do that -- the reason would have to be more than "Potomac is not accepting traffic." What if the area of unavailable airspace was a hot MOA or Restricted area? Then ATC would have to contact the relevant military aircraft and make the airspace cold if weather requires their airspace to be used for traffic already on an IFR clearance. I've been rerouted enroute because of an area going hot after i No problem if there are no weather or other reasons to preclude your reroute. I am not saying to decline the new clearance arbitrarily -- only to decline it if there are weather concerns. whats available), turn back or land. The controller cant offer what he doesnt have available. If you tell the controller you are "Unable" to accept an alternate route, he may well be able to negotiate for more airspace to become available. Bottom line: A clearance is a clearance. You must accept an assigned revised clearance if it is within your capability, but if you judge the revised clearance to be unsafe there is no reason why you need to accept it and instead ATC will work with you to find a solution. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flap handle activated Climb/Cruise switching | Andy Smielkiewicz | Soaring | 5 | March 14th 05 04:54 AM |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
G103 Acro airbrake handle | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 12 | January 18th 04 11:51 PM |
How do you handle your EFB in the cockpit? | greg | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 17th 03 03:47 AM |
Need door handle for 1959 Cessna 175 | Paul Millner | Owning | 0 | July 4th 03 07:36 PM |