![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a bull**** attitude. Sounds like, "you are not worthy of
discussing a possible mistake on my part". The running of the airline cockpit has had a reputation of something closer to an old sailing ship than a well led team operation (a much improved reputation over the last 20 years) At the same time, the military seems to have it in their DNA that open, objective review of safety and accident activity is the key to safety and performance improvement. An airline pilot who thinks he doesn't have any peers in the club where he's flying a Skylane is a danger to all involved. Sounds like the hack surgeon hiding behind his professional armor when questioned by another injured patient (i.e. mere patient). All professions have the armor but they need to drop them when outside the office. Flying the club Skylane is not their workplace. Flak suit on! Michael wrote: The facts of the matter are not in dispute. The pilot, so far as I know, does not deny that he basically ran the plane dry. There is a difference between not denying and admitting. In this case, possibly a big difference. No one involved seriously entertains any other scenario. Then let me entertain one for you. There is some perfectly logical explanation (meaning that something really unexpected happened, or there was something the pilot didn't know about) and this situation is a far cry from stupidly running the plane almost dry - but the pilot has no wish to discuss it with someone he sees as not being his peer. It's not an unusual situation. I know several airline captains - and I can't think of a single one who would discuss such a thing with some random member of the flying club. I don't know who the chief instructor is, but it's entirely likely he doesn't meet with the captain's seal of approval either. I've known quite a few club chief instructors who got (and deserved) nothing but contempt from airline captains. In other words, you may be dealing with a situation that is not nearly so cut-and-dried as you think it is, and with a pilot who believes you have no right or standing to question him. In fact, I think this is the most likely situation. If what he did was actually against a specific, written club rule, you might be able to have him thrownout of the club. If not, it might be far more difficult. You can send a letter to his chief pilot, but unless someone can sign it with an ATP, it will certainly be ignored. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Safety at risk by Unqualified FAA Management | Peterpan | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | February 24th 05 01:00 PM |
Shadin's Fuel Flow Management System | Tom Alton | Products | 0 | September 1st 04 06:07 PM |
Boeing Scaling Back its Air Traffic Management Business | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 9 | March 13th 04 02:36 PM |
Cessna 172 with Wild Fuel Gauge Needle | jls | Owning | 26 | February 20th 04 05:56 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |