![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
ups.com... As long as warbirds fly there will be an attrition rate. What makes me NUTS is the people who have the priviledge (and $$$) to own/fly these irreplaceable aircraft and race them putting them at risk of damage or total loss. Risking the loss of a piece of history, to say nothing of the pilot, just for the sake of a 400mph thrill ride is insane. What's insane is thinking that it's for some reason important to preserve these planes. As I already pointed out, if they were so important to preserve, we shouldn't have been building them to be destroyed in the first place. More importantly, it's irrational to be concerned about not being able to replace the airplanes. They aren't useful objects anymore (except, perhaps, for the entertainment value they provide at air races and other airshows). It is a fundamental truth that every last P-51 will eventually be destroyed, just as every other thing that humanity has ever created will eventually be destroyed. Even if P-51s were important to our survival as a species (and they clearly are not), it would be futile to expect any to not eventually be destroyed. I find this irrationality even more amusing in the context of a newsgroup where there were a handful of folks talking about how "irrational" people with religious faith are. I suppose folks here don't mind being irrational as long as it's their own preferential brand of irrationality. If it's someone else's, that's apparently cause for derision. I'd like to see them all restored to their military condition and flown at air shows. Much less chance of accidents there IMHO. Oh. So it turns out, you're not actually against the destruction of these warbirds after all. You would just rather see them destroyed for your pleasure at airshows, rather than for someone else's pleasure at air races. The only way to guarantee there won't be a crash is to not fly the plane. Even stored in a building, they will all eventually be destroyed (though perhaps not in our lifetime). But flying them, even just for display at airshows, they are unlikely to suffer significantly less attrition than for air racing (your statement was obviously made without bother to compare accident statistics for the air races to those for flying displays at airshows). Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|