![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jose" wrote in message ... Because ATC is supposed to be helpful, and this is not. Why isn't it helpful for ATC to ask the pilot's intentions? Do you think it'd be better if ATC decided on a remedial course of action without input from the pilot? The pilot has no idea what "Potomac" is (from a routing standpoint) The controller does. Ask him. or for how long they will be refusing to honor the clearance the pilot =already= has. Until about 2 AM. Therefore the pilot has no basis from which to plan a new routing, or to consider the altenratives. He knows he can't go through Potomac approach and he doesn't want to go through the weather, he needs to select an alternative to those. That shouldn't be too hard for any experienced pilot. ATC however does know the pilot's destination and equipment, and probably has a pretty good idea of what the weather and traffic ahead is. Therefore ATC is in a good position to offer helpful alternatives. They are refusing to do so. No they're not. Empirically, it's an odd thing to say because it is rarely said. That by itself makes it odd. That you haven't experienced it doesn't make it rare, it just means you're inexperienced. Many high density TRACONs simply do not work thruflights. The pilot certainly can fly that route. ATC doesn't want him to. Specifically Potomac doesn't want him to. The pilot can't fly that route because Potomac approach says he can't. Meaningful input requires information that ATC has, that the pilot doesn't, and that ATC is pointedly not giving the pilot. The pilot can ask, ATC can't read minds. Perhaps we have different definitions of "accomodating". Perhaps. I use Webster's. What do you use? Let's see if I can learn something, and turn this around. Oooh, something new! It's =you= flying up the coast, say to Teterboro. You're directly on the other side of Potomac Approach's airspace (whatever shape it happens to be at that time). For argument's sake, you're at 5000 feet in a rental 172RG with a moving map GPS, no radar, no spherics, and no weather imagery available to you (except via descriptions on the radio). You have three and a half hours of gas, and have a clearance through to your destination, which takes you in between building TCU. There are cells to your west and northwest somewhere, maybe forty miles off your route. You're IMC. "N423YL, Potomac is refusing to handle you. What are your intentions?" How do you respond? I respond with, "Never mind that center, my route takes me in between building TCU. N423YL requests clearance to Richmond via direct." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flap handle activated Climb/Cruise switching | Andy Smielkiewicz | Soaring | 5 | March 14th 05 04:54 AM |
You Want Control? You Can't Handle Control! -- Was 140 dead | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | March 2nd 04 08:48 PM |
G103 Acro airbrake handle | Andy Durbin | Soaring | 12 | January 18th 04 11:51 PM |
How do you handle your EFB in the cockpit? | greg | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 17th 03 03:47 AM |
Need door handle for 1959 Cessna 175 | Paul Millner | Owning | 0 | July 4th 03 07:36 PM |