![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, cool, thank you very, VERY much for posting those references.
The FAA's policy subject to ICAO membership doesn't make it regulatory, as the ICAO is a standards organization and holds no sovereignty. If a DOT organinzation outside the FAA, or a department outside the DOT, adopted those ICAO standards as regulatory, then the FAA would assume an indirect regulatory role - even so, the equipment requirement would be arguable (the equipment assumption is for the purpose of determining minima, not actual navigation, and regulatory equipment requirements are otherwise very precise). But, as far as I know, this is not the case. The second part describes Class I and Class II navigation, but doesn't spell out an equipment requirement either. On the contrary, it says that you don't automatically need equipment appropriate for the corresponding class of navigation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good | Excelsior | Home Built | 0 | April 22nd 05 01:11 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |