A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Report: More than 3,400 airspace violations since 9/11



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12  
Old July 26th 05, 11:21 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:25:44 -0400, Bob Noel
wrote in
::

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:

Hey, I'm just quoting Governor Fletcher:


ok.


http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...printable.html
As AVweb told you two weeks ago, a civilian
contractor failed to notice the manual tracking tags attached to
the radar image of Fletcher's transponder-less airplane and that
triggered the evacuation of the Capitol building and the
scrambling of F-16s. According to the Post, an F-16 was looking
for the King Air but the pilot couldn't visually identify it
because of cloud cover. Moments later, the plane began a normal
approach to DCA and the military called off the attack. Fletcher
told the Lexington Herald that he was originally told he was
"milliseconds" from being shot down.

Can you cite a reference for your refutation of his words?


Actually, look at your reference. Do you see anywhere in it that the
F-16's were actually authorized to shootdown the aircraft?




Absent such
an authorization, there is no way that Fletcher could have been
milliseconds from being shot down. (Never mind that even if such
a shoot down order was given - which wasn't, the F-16's still would
have had to acquire the target.)

Also, Fletcher was "originally told ..." by who? Was that person in
the room where the weapons and surveillance operators were? Or was
that person on the conference call? Did that person see or hear
any authorization to shoot? Lacking that, there isn't anything to refute.



In any event, the pilot wasn't at fault for this ADIZ violation, but
under Mica's proposed bill, only pilots will be fined $100,000.00 for
DC ADIZ violations. That is unjust.


Agreed.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
FAA: 157 airspace violations since 9/11 AJ Piloting 26 January 6th 04 12:59 AM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.