![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah the one strap for the wing join just "needs" something doesn't it!
![]() As for the main struts,..if you use the design diameters it should be ok wouldn't you think. They did build these as a kit and of course I am just guessing here (since I wasn't alive wayyy back then! ![]() been a warping problem as "built as designed" wouldn't we have heard about it? Not arguing with you mind you, it is a distinct possibility with "not the right stuff" for the job. I may have to just get an old mechanix Illustrated copy and see the changes Paul made,...heck I may like his design as well. Patrick "Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message ... "W P Dixon" : Yep, I am thinking on the lines of the cabin ace myself and I have noticed the wing attach. If anyone knows of a reported failure I'd sure like to know about it. May have to see if I can get ahold of the old Mechanix Illustrated article of Paul's as well. I think I'd be an idiot to pay for plans from a place in Georgia or whomever, when they are public record in any library since being published. I imagine they have made improvements, but it comes to a point when you are overkilling something and just adding weight..so I am trying to see where that fine line ends and starts I guess you could say. Just had a look at the old magazine article. Teh strut attach points aren't the best design either, but they're not the worst form that period. The wing attach points would definitely have to be redone, though. The straps simply aren't a good idea. The 30s version also has no jury struts. If you omit them and the main struts are of insufficient dia and thickness to resist flexing under compression, you'll get control reversal when your wings warp as you aply aileron! (I know someone who rebuilt a T-craft and did exactly this). The strut attachments to the lower fuselage are OK, though I'd alter the rear one and subsitute something closer to the front, but the rear strap arrangement would be OK. The top fuse to wing weldments really have to be changed, though. There wouldn't be a lot of extra weight. Couple of pounds, tops. Just looking at them now, though, It's hard to see how it would be done with the cross members buched up around the wing area. Someone has built a replica of that airplane form original plans, though, and you could always ask him! Just found him, in fact... http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/NNum...Numbertxt=386m Good luck! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fly Baby Plans Sets Wanted | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 9th 04 06:18 AM |
Fly Baby Plans Off the Market | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 04 02:45 PM |
New Home of the Fly Baby | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 17 | February 20th 04 02:38 PM |
100th anniversary baby born | [email protected] | Home Built | 7 | December 19th 03 05:25 AM |
Tire talc...baby powder? | No Spam | Owning | 12 | August 8th 03 05:03 PM |