A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Baby Ace



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old July 31st 05, 10:45 PM
W P Dixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah the one strap for the wing join just "needs" something doesn't it!
As for the main struts,..if you use the design diameters it should be ok
wouldn't you think. They did build these as a kit and of course I am just
guessing here (since I wasn't alive wayyy back then! ) but if there had
been a warping problem as "built as designed" wouldn't we have heard about
it? Not arguing with you mind you, it is a distinct possibility with "not
the right stuff" for the job. I may have to just get an old mechanix
Illustrated copy and see the changes Paul made,...heck I may like his design
as well.

Patrick

"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
"W P Dixon"
:

Yep,
I am thinking on the lines of the cabin ace myself and I have
noticed the
wing attach. If anyone knows of a reported failure I'd sure like to
know about it. May have to see if I can get ahold of the old Mechanix
Illustrated article of Paul's as well. I think I'd be an idiot to pay
for plans from a place in Georgia or whomever, when they are public
record in any library since being published.
I imagine they have made improvements, but it comes to a point
when you
are overkilling something and just adding weight..so I am trying to
see where that fine line ends and starts I guess you could say.


Just had a look at the old magazine article. Teh strut attach points
aren't
the best design either, but they're not the worst form that period. The
wing attach points would definitely have to be redone, though. The straps
simply aren't a good idea. The 30s version also has no jury struts. If you
omit them and the main struts are of insufficient dia and thickness to
resist flexing under compression, you'll get control reversal when your
wings warp as you aply aileron! (I know someone who rebuilt a T-craft and
did exactly this). The strut attachments to the lower fuselage are OK,
though I'd alter the rear one and subsitute something closer to the front,
but the rear strap arrangement would be OK. The top fuse to wing weldments
really have to be changed, though. There wouldn't be a lot of extra
weight.
Couple of pounds, tops. Just looking at them now, though, It's hard to see
how it would be done with the cross members buched up around the wing
area.
Someone has built a replica of that airplane form original plans, though,
and you could always ask him!
Just found him, in fact...

http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/NNum...Numbertxt=386m

Good luck!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fly Baby Plans Sets Wanted Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 June 9th 04 06:18 AM
Fly Baby Plans Off the Market Ron Wanttaja Home Built 9 June 6th 04 02:45 PM
New Home of the Fly Baby Ron Wanttaja Home Built 17 February 20th 04 02:38 PM
100th anniversary baby born [email protected] Home Built 7 December 19th 03 05:25 AM
Tire talc...baby powder? No Spam Owning 12 August 8th 03 05:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.