![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:30:38 -0500, "Robert Henry" wrote: That assumes there is a problem. The way it has been explained to me is that the rules that apply for departing IFR at a non-towered field apply in this case, and that operating under the understanding that terrain separation services are available when departing a towered field (especially a VFR-only one as in my case) is just a bad one. I have read and reread this paragraph, and I must confess I don't understand what you are saying, at least in the context of ATC and ODP's. If you fly an ODP, you will have terrain separation. It doesn't matter what field you are departing from. Assuming it's an IFR airport. If not, then the airspace has not been evaluated for takeoff minimums and 40:1 surfaces. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approaches with Center | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 104 | October 22nd 03 09:42 PM |
IFR Routing Toronto to Windsor (CYTZ - CYQG) | Rob Pesan | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | October 7th 03 01:50 PM |
required readback on clearance | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 17th 03 04:33 PM |
Picking up a Clearance Airborne | Brad Z | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 03 01:31 AM |
Big John Bites Dicks (Security Clearance) | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 27 | August 21st 03 12:40 AM |