A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

single pilot ifr trip tonight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old November 6th 03, 10:00 PM
Jeremy Lew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Of course, the "synthetic TC" is just the GPS taking the course change delta
and displaying it graphically in a familiar way. It knows that a 3
degree/sec turn should be painted as a TC showing a standard rate turn .
You can do the same thing in your head, it's just somewhat less precise.
During the last dual flight before my ASEL checkride, my instructor failed
the instruments one by one until all I was left with was a non-moving-map
GPS, which was displaying my course as a digital readout. Even just using
this, it was possible to keep flying the plane in smooth air with the hood
on, pretty much indefinitely.

"Snowbird" wrote in message
om...
Roy Smith wrote in message

...
A friend of mine and me tried an experiement once. I put our Archer
into some unusual attitudes, and he recovered using just the synthetic
instruments on his handheld GPS (Garmin something-or-other, might have
been the 295 but I'm not sure). Conditions were night VFR, no
turbulence.


I haven't tried this yet, and I really should.

What I can say is that IME it's significantly easier to fly
a full approach partial panel at night with either my panel
moving map, or my handheld moving map, than it is with both
failed, and that this is not because it's easier to navigate
per se, but because it's easier to *keep the wings perfectly
level* in TB or chop by using the track info on either GPS
to hold a steady track. (Basically, I would hold that navigation
at its most fundamental is simply the ability to hold heading,
and that the ability to hold heading at its most fundamental
is simply the ability to keep the wings level).

Our CFI has absolutely no regard for the FAA's views on
which instruments to fail or how many *g* and we did this
very deliberatly as an emergency exercise, in order to learn
exactly how much info we extract from the moving maps and
the best setup to extract it from our particular equipment.

If he ignored pitch (let the trim take care of it)
and just used rudder to zero out rate of turn on the synthetic TC, he
did pretty well.


I don't have a "synthetic TC", but it sounds analogous to what
I learned to do in the way of zeroing the change on the track.

I'll have to see about trying it with unusual attitudes.

Best,
Sydney



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
I wonder if Chris Thomas is a real pilot? Anybody know? Badwater Bill Home Built 116 September 3rd 04 05:43 PM
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? Badwater Bill Home Built 3 June 23rd 04 04:05 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.