![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course, the "synthetic TC" is just the GPS taking the course change delta
and displaying it graphically in a familiar way. It knows that a 3 degree/sec turn should be painted as a TC showing a standard rate turn . You can do the same thing in your head, it's just somewhat less precise. During the last dual flight before my ASEL checkride, my instructor failed the instruments one by one until all I was left with was a non-moving-map GPS, which was displaying my course as a digital readout. Even just using this, it was possible to keep flying the plane in smooth air with the hood on, pretty much indefinitely. "Snowbird" wrote in message om... Roy Smith wrote in message ... A friend of mine and me tried an experiement once. I put our Archer into some unusual attitudes, and he recovered using just the synthetic instruments on his handheld GPS (Garmin something-or-other, might have been the 295 but I'm not sure). Conditions were night VFR, no turbulence. I haven't tried this yet, and I really should. What I can say is that IME it's significantly easier to fly a full approach partial panel at night with either my panel moving map, or my handheld moving map, than it is with both failed, and that this is not because it's easier to navigate per se, but because it's easier to *keep the wings perfectly level* in TB or chop by using the track info on either GPS to hold a steady track. (Basically, I would hold that navigation at its most fundamental is simply the ability to hold heading, and that the ability to hold heading at its most fundamental is simply the ability to keep the wings level). Our CFI has absolutely no regard for the FAA's views on which instruments to fail or how many *g* and we did this very deliberatly as an emergency exercise, in order to learn exactly how much info we extract from the moving maps and the best setup to extract it from our particular equipment. If he ignored pitch (let the trim take care of it) and just used rudder to zero out rate of turn on the synthetic TC, he did pretty well. I don't have a "synthetic TC", but it sounds analogous to what I learned to do in the way of zeroing the change on the track. I'll have to see about trying it with unusual attitudes. Best, Sydney |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
I wonder if Chris Thomas is a real pilot? Anybody know? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 116 | September 3rd 04 05:43 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation | Gilan | Home Built | 17 | September 24th 03 06:11 AM |