![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder wr.giacona@coxDOTnet wrote:
Ok. sorry but the vast majority of flying Skyhawks are not the newer SPs but the older "plain old Skyhawks." Well, Gig, I have to thank you. Your statement above was screaming for a reference to back it up but instead of putting the burden on you, I decided to try to prove or disprove it myself. Therefore, I visited the FAA website and discovered that the FAA registered aircraft database is offered there as a free, downloadable zip file. Without a database management tool on my PC, I then downloaded the Open Source database product called MySQL. Fortunately for me, there was a Windows install routine that made installation and configuration rather painless. I then created a couple of tables and imported the aircraft reference data and the master registration data from the FAA zip file (data current as of August 5th, 2005). The end result? I was able to query the two tables to see exactly how many C172s manufactured from 1997 onward are registered compared to the number of C172s manufactured prior to 1996. Note that it appears that 1986 was the year Cessna ceased production of C172s until the GA Revitalization Act, but for some reason there are three aircraft in the database with a 1988 MFG date and 1 with a 1994 date (perhaps this was a test A/C?). Of course, there is the legitimate argument that not all aircraft registered are actively flown. Logic suggests that this would be more applicable to older aircraft than newer, so the pre-1996 numbers could be lowered by some degree. Here are the results: Number of C172s registered, pre- and post-General Aviation Revitalization Act (C172s produced from 1997 onward are all the modern, fuel-injected, more advanced avionics models we have been discussing): 1997 onward - 2,305 1986 and prior - 24,251 So, about 91% of all registered C172s are pre-1996. I suppose that qualifies as a vast majority. ![]() -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | December 2nd 04 07:00 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |