![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter R." wrote in message ... .... In any case, I am curious how it is possible for two transmissions to be heard over an aviation frequency without the squeal (I forgot the appropriate technical term for this). The "squeal" that you refer to, is the absolute difference in frequency between the two base carriers of the two different transmitters. This "difference" is known as the "beat" frequency. If the two base-carrier frequencies are exactly correct, then the difference would be zero and no "beat" sound would be produced. Today's equipment... it is normal to maintain transmitter frequencies very, very accurate. The human ear does not hear very well below about 20 hertz, so a tiny difference of 5 or 10 hertz would not produce any "sound", either... although it may manifest itself as a quick "pulsing" in the volume of the signals as your receiver attempts to handle the interfering signals. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RAP & RAH Oshkosh field frequency | RST Engineering | Owning | 24 | July 23rd 05 03:42 AM |
RAP & RAH Oshkosh field frequency | RST Engineering | Piloting | 20 | July 23rd 05 03:42 AM |
Boston Approach frequency question | John R | Piloting | 6 | June 22nd 04 08:22 PM |
Picking up ATC from 300 NM away? Frequency bleed? | Peter R. | Piloting | 10 | August 21st 03 02:32 PM |
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... | Roy | Piloting | 4 | July 12th 03 04:03 PM |