![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How could anyone persist after receiving a PERSONAL
E-mail. How rude and inconsiderate. Perhaps he doesn't know who you are or maybe he just doesn't care but you could avoid all of your suffering by choosing, which authors posts you open. At 08:36 11 August 2005, Jeremy Hood wrote: JJ, You are clearly a total moron. I emailed you personally about this subject, yet you persist in your irresponsible, innaccurate, and sensationalist cr@p. You have no idea what you are talking about. Do us all a favour and shut up. At 01:54 11 August 2005, Jj Sinclair wrote: Well, Kirk, the first poster said the pilot was finishing. He also said the pilot was arrested, why? Because he committed a homicide. That's right he was responsible for the death of an innocent bystander. This tragic loss of life occured because the junior pilot was performing the prescribed finish maneuver. He was flying the finish gate because that's what we do, we sanction it, its in our rules. The local authoraties did their job, they arrested the guy responsible and the competition was suspended. How many more finish gate accidents must we endure before this outmoded, unneccessary and proven unsafe finish gate is abolished and replaced by the mandatory GPS finish cylinder? You really don't want to argue that the pilot wasn't operating his aircraft below 500 feet (not in the act of landing) and that he wasn't within 500 feet of a person, do you? JJ Sinclair wrote: Condolences to all affected by this tragedy. But, JJ, tell me how a correctly performed contest finish at 50 ft (per current SRA rules) and per FARs (no overflying of people, man-made objects, reckless, etc) has direct relevance with this accident? By your logic, takeoffs should be done away with (ref groundloop that hit and injured spectator at Tonopah) at contests, too. And how do you know it was a finish - it could have been a pre-arranged photo op after the finish, coordinated between the photographer and the pilot - that went horribly wrong. Not the first time that has happened. Sorry, you are on the wrong soapbox this time. Take a deep breath and go fix a glider or something. Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coalition casualties for October | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | November 4th 03 11:14 PM |