A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Engine on New homebuilt



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old August 14th 05, 08:40 PM
ls
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

David Koehler wrote:
Greetings All,
First, thank you for all the insight, I've been all over the net, from
Lycoming to Glastar. It seems that the break in is to seat the rings and if
it's not done correctly the cylinder walls will glaze and the rings will
never seat. One can start the engine up for short runs monitoring the
temperature until the "break-in" can be done. We're not talking about 3 or 4
years, just a few runs not to exceed 3 minutes each and turning the engine
off. I believe with smaller engines (rotax) you can tie them to a pole.
Again, Thanks to all, without all the input I would still be going in
circles.
david


Yes, with the rotax 2-strokes, the breakin procedure is normally done
with the airplane tied down. It's a little over an hour, but involves
starting slow and gradually increasing the amount of work the motor
does. Overall, there's only about 5 or 6 minutes of full throttle
operation, most of it right at the end. The motor is essentially ready
to fly at the end of it with the rings just about fully seated. In my
experience, though, about 10 hours is needed to fully break it in and
get stable CHT's.

I'm a strong believer in the tied-to-the-pole breakin procedure since it
not only allows a breakin but also proves the motor installation. If
there's a problem with your mounting job, it'll definitely show up
during that screaming breakin.

Also, if there's a fatal, major defect in the motor that'll show up too
as a siezure or explosion or whatever.

The nice thing is, the the plane tied down, all this will happen on the
ground instead of way up in the air......

That's not a hard and fast rule though, as some manufacturers recommend
the breakin be done in the air.....

LS
N646F

"David Koehler" wrote in message
...

Hi All,
I'm not there yet, but, I have a new Lycoming O-360 and in the process of
building a homebuilt kit. Lycoming says to break in the engine at full


power

and gives procedures on how to do it. The kit needs slow taxi, then fast
taxi, glazing of the brakes. After take off there are procedures to do at
lower power.... I know I'm not the FIRST in this dilemma, so what takes a
preference? If you wait to do the full power to seat the rings, is that


ok?

Thanks for any response, I'm at a loss,
david





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
V-8 powered Seabee Corky Scott Home Built 212 October 2nd 04 11:45 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 May 1st 04 07:29 PM
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts Eric D Rotorcraft 22 March 5th 04 06:11 AM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.