![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Koehler wrote:
Greetings All, First, thank you for all the insight, I've been all over the net, from Lycoming to Glastar. It seems that the break in is to seat the rings and if it's not done correctly the cylinder walls will glaze and the rings will never seat. One can start the engine up for short runs monitoring the temperature until the "break-in" can be done. We're not talking about 3 or 4 years, just a few runs not to exceed 3 minutes each and turning the engine off. I believe with smaller engines (rotax) you can tie them to a pole. Again, Thanks to all, without all the input I would still be going in circles. david Yes, with the rotax 2-strokes, the breakin procedure is normally done with the airplane tied down. It's a little over an hour, but involves starting slow and gradually increasing the amount of work the motor does. Overall, there's only about 5 or 6 minutes of full throttle operation, most of it right at the end. The motor is essentially ready to fly at the end of it with the rings just about fully seated. In my experience, though, about 10 hours is needed to fully break it in and get stable CHT's. I'm a strong believer in the tied-to-the-pole breakin procedure since it not only allows a breakin but also proves the motor installation. If there's a problem with your mounting job, it'll definitely show up during that screaming breakin. Also, if there's a fatal, major defect in the motor that'll show up too as a siezure or explosion or whatever. The nice thing is, the the plane tied down, all this will happen on the ground instead of way up in the air...... That's not a hard and fast rule though, as some manufacturers recommend the breakin be done in the air..... LS N646F "David Koehler" wrote in message ... Hi All, I'm not there yet, but, I have a new Lycoming O-360 and in the process of building a homebuilt kit. Lycoming says to break in the engine at full power and gives procedures on how to do it. The kit needs slow taxi, then fast taxi, glazing of the brakes. After take off there are procedures to do at lower power.... I know I'm not the FIRST in this dilemma, so what takes a preference? If you wait to do the full power to seat the rings, is that ok? Thanks for any response, I'm at a loss, david |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
V-8 powered Seabee | Corky Scott | Home Built | 212 | October 2nd 04 11:45 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Autorotation ? R22 for the Experts | Eric D | Rotorcraft | 22 | March 5th 04 06:11 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |