![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Yossarian" wrote in message
oups.com... [...] Now the CFI can't make it and wants to know if I will make the trip instead. I would pay for half the flight expenses and of course be PIC for both flights. Is this legal? IMHO, no. Even though you are meeting the "pro-rata" requirement, you would be violating the "common purpose" case law. Personally, I think requirements should all be found in the FARs themselves, but that's just not how things work. The fact that you would not otherwise be making the trip is what the FAA would complain about. I am assuming that by "half the flight expenses", you mean for the portion when the student pilot is in the airplane, and that for the other two legs (when you are by yourself) you would pay 100% of the expenses. Being reimbursed at all for the legs you were alone would be an obvious violation of even the written FAR. That said, unless your pilot certificate reads "Yossarian", it seems unlikely anyone would be concerned at all. ![]() "Yossarian", either your parents had a cynical expectation for your life, or a strange sense of humor ![]() Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Recommendations for Private Pilot CDs? | pjbphd | Piloting | 10 | October 12th 04 02:10 AM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 07:56 PM |