![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 18-Aug-2005, "Doug" wrote: I am quite sure that one can offer an aircraft for hire with an instructor under part 91 with an engine that has gone beyond TBO. My understanding of the "official" FAA interpretation is as follows: Renting an airplane, as opposed to chartering one, does not constitute a commercial, "for hire" use. Hiring of a flight instructor is a separate transaction not tied to the rental of the airplane. Therefore, regulations specifically governing commercial operations do not apply to airplanes that are rented out for instruction or for general use by pilots, regardless of whether dual instruction is given. Of course, if the pilot renting the airplane is going to use it for commercial purposes then the plane must meet commercial use maintenance and operational regulations. Because this interpretation is contrary to widely held belief it is not surprising that a local FSDO would provide a different reading. -- -Elliott Drucker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|