![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a student, I would like to interject here with a couple of comments
and questions... 1. I have learned from this discussion that everyone has an opinion, and their opinion is quite strongly held. Does anyone have any data, on either side, to back up their opinion? How often do planes have trouble caused by not knowing precisely how much gas they have, perhaps influenced by inaccurate gages? How often do planes have trouble caused by running a tank dry (NOT running the _last_ tank dry)? 2. There seems to be a lot of discussion mentioning that the only way to be sure of your tank's capacity is to run it dry. In my reading about flying, I notice that folks talk about measuring fuel by looking in the tanks and perhaps using a dipstick. Couldn't you calibrate your gages by filling the tanks, going for a flight, then sticking a ruler into the tank to see how much is left? Is running the tank dry any more accurate or useful? To me, the two sides of this debate seems to be as follows: some folks want to be in control of every aspect of their flight, while other folks want to have as wide of a saftey margin as possible at all times. The fuel tank issue is one where these two goals conflict. To the control oriented folks, having a tank run dry when they expect it gives them one more data point which makes them more comfortable and feel more in control during the flight. Any small change in flight characteristics is detectable by a change in tank switch timings, and so these folks are willing to accept what they think is a small risk in changing tanks in order to detect any problems. The safety margin folks feel more comfortable not knowing precisely how much margin of safety they have, as long as that margin is wide enough that they never have to worry about it. To these folks minor problems will be covered by their ample margin of safety, and major problems will become apparent on their gages. These folks want to make sure they have as much fuel as possible in reserve in all tanks when the major problem hits, and don't worry about missing a couple of minor problems as a result. Is my characterization accurate? Chris -- Chris Colohan Email: PGP: finger Web: www.colohan.com Phone: (412)268-4751 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Engine running again, the good, bad and ugly | Corky Scott | Home Built | 34 | July 6th 05 05:04 PM |
It's finally running! | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | April 29th 05 04:53 PM |
Rotax 503 won't stop running | Tracy | Home Built | 2 | March 28th 04 04:56 PM |
Leaving all engines running at the gate | John | Piloting | 12 | February 5th 04 03:46 AM |