![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have to fall firmly and loudly into the "digital is good, electrical
insturments can be reliable, mechanical varios belong in museums" group. I would love to see a serious study that shows that classic analog airspeed and altimeters (as used in gliders) are easier to read and less susceptible to misinterpretation than a properly designed (but unfortunately, theoretical) replacement digital airspeed and altimeter. With the advent of Head-up-Displays (HUDs), fighter planes have moved to almost completely digital displays of most values - only those where trend is crucial, such as vertical velocity and radar altitude, continue to have a companion analog display. Otherwise, its a straight number, usually rounded off to the nearest knot and 10 feet. Works fine in an F-15E, should work pretty good in an LS6 By comparison, trying to interpret a three-needle altimeter is like trying to read sanskrit! And then there are 1 1/2 revolution airspeed indicators! If you have a PDA in your cockpit, try setting it up to have a nice big font altitude (and speed, if available) display on it and try it - you might find that it is really easy to glance at and read. I have two seperated battery systems, and no mechanical vario. I'm stuck with a "steam-gauge" airspeed indicator and altimeter, but what I would really like is a digital airspeed, digital altimeter, and an accurate AOA indicator. For tradition, I'll keep the vario needles - since there I'm looking for trend (to provide a value to the audio), and read a digital averager for real decision making. Heck, last year I took off on a fine day only to find my airspeed inop (bug in the pitot) - but that didn't prevent me from flying a nice little 500+ k XC with some friends of mine. The only time I really missed the airspeed indicator was in the pattern. Just flew it a bit faster than usual (that AOA indicator sure would have been nice to have then...). Now the huge caveat - this is all fine in a private ship - I don't see how a the average club ship would manage. Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Metric measuring tool source? | DL152279546231 | Home Built | 12 | April 29th 04 02:13 AM |
Reverse Vacuum Damging to Instruments? | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 8 | February 16th 04 04:00 AM |
metric system newsgroup call for votes #1 | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 72 | November 16th 03 06:59 PM |
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 146 | November 3rd 03 05:18 PM |
Wanted - Metric Altimeters | RHWOODY | Soaring | 0 | September 13th 03 10:20 PM |