![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() hi: I have a simple question for the piloting physics majors. we all know that planes have less air resistance to overcome at higher altitudes, but that normally aspirated planes have less power at higher altitudes. presumably, both are proportions of what happens at sea level, and are hopefully not too plane dependent. That is, I would guess that a 160hp engine would lose about the same proportion of power as a 320hp engine. for lycomings, at 10,000', this proportion is about 50%. something similar [proportional reduction] may also happen to air resistance, regardless of whether the plane is a cub or a lancair. this leads me to a very simple question: on a standard day, without any winds, what would be the optimal altitude for [cruise] speed in a normally aspirated airplane? is this best altitude dependent on aircraft to a first-order, or is it fairly constant across airplanes? sincerely, /ivo welch |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |