![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Dave Stadt wrote: "sfb" wrote in message news:kS7Se.977$IT4.248@trnddc04... You remember correctly, but it takes time to assemble troops in armories, load vehicles, and move into the disaster areas clearing roads and bridges of debris as necessary. Six days? That's nuts. Even Bush is saying the time to respond was far beyond reasonable. It took 9/11 for us to take terrorism seriously. Perhaps now we will take civil defense seriously. I live in Boston and while we're not below sea level, a 20' storm surge (let along dirty bomb or attack on an LNG terminal) would make one hell of a mess. Now I suspect there will be a lot more people asking the local gov't just what the plan would be should we be staring down a similar barrel. -cwk. Hopefully from the current disorganized mess some good will come. NO, LA and the feds were out smoking dope or doing something other that what they should have been doing. NY handled 9/11 infinitely better and they had no warning. Granted, the scale is much different. The response to the most current disaster after several years of homeland security gibberish is atrocious. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|