![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So the requirement has nothing at all to do with the
safety of pilots, just for the peace of mind of contest organisers. Thank you for explaining it so clearly. At 18:24 06 September 2005, Bb wrote: People in this discussion should stop to read the excellent FAQs about the ELT requirement on the SRA website: http://sailplane-racing.org/Rules/CR...T%20FAQ%20.htm It explains the rationale for the rule quite clearly. Briefly, the requirement is there to protect contest organizers, and at their request, rather than to force unwanted protection on pilots. Imagine running a contest, someone goes missing, and day after day passes. That's also why the rules require a mounted, impact-activated device. John Cochrane BB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
FAI Sporting Code Section 3 experts wanted | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 28 | September 1st 04 05:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 01:13 PM |