![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My insurance doesn't require anything except annual recurrent training at
one of two places. Other than that requirement, there are no restrictions. Mike MU-2 "markjen" wrote in message news:Et4zb.200680$Dw6.744902@attbi_s02... The original poster said that he wanted to be able to get places on a schedule. What that requires depends on where you are and where you are going, but to me it requires radar, known ice, high altitude capability and range. I think there are two issues he suitability for single-pilot use and capability to tackle weather. The two sorta work against one another - probably the easiest to fly plane IFR is something like an 182, but you're not going to be tackling much weather. Conversely, a plane like Mike's MU-2 is very capable, but you've got to ante up to very high proficiency standards. (Mike, are your insurers Ok with you flying alone in clouds? I've heard they're starting to get very sticky about turbines twins being flown single-pilot.) In reality, we don't choose planes that are good for single-pilot IFR - we choose planes that suit our mission (and constraints, particularly costs) and then ante up what it takes to fly them safely IFR. For me, a non-professional IFR pilot who gets maybe 5 hours a year actual in my non-iced heavy single, this means scrubbing a lot of flights. I think that is the big fallacy with new instrument pilots - that they can truly fly in any weather and can meet hard schedule committments. It takes a lot of airplane and a lot of training/experience to be able to consistently tackle IFR weather with reasonable risk. I'd guess that on any given mission, I can make it VFR 80% of the time. IFR cuts my scrubs in half so I can go 890% of the time, but I still have a 10% scrub rate even with the the ticket. Ice is the big issue for me. In reality, I use IFR more for flying security and convenience rather that tackling weather. It's just a lot easier to file IFR and follow ATC's instructions rather than keeping track of everything yourself, especially with all the airspace restrictions these days. - Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
single pilot ifr trip tonight | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 187 | November 24th 03 10:18 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |