![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
poor choice of wording on "Vne is based on TAS" ....
Vne is actually based on other structral limits, flutter, drag buffets, control etc.. and is equated to a value in speed. Not all GA aircraft have Mach Meters or "barber pole" indications, most only have IAS so that is what is used. One can watch the barber pole move with control changes, altitude changes or changes in wing sweep position. BT "BTIZ" wrote in message news:yN_Ue.14282$ct5.10523@fed1read04... Should we be doing preflight calculations of Vne IAS reductions when planning aerobatics at 9000 ft. or soaring or high speed flight at 15-18,000 ft? Many gliders capable of Vne around 146 kias below 10,000 MSL actually have lower IAS Vne charted for altitudes above 10,000ft MSL and in 3000ft blocks. The DG1000 has the following limits. Vne at 10,000ft is 146KIAS, 13,000ft is 138KIAS, 16,000ft is 131KIAS, 20,000ft is 114KIAS, 23,000ft is 117KIAS and 26,000ft is 111KIAS Vne is based on IAS, TAS for the same IAS is higher at higher altitudes. But remember, it's not just airspeed, or airspeed indicator errors associated with altitude changes, but also other dynamic "q" factors on the airframe at higher "effective" airspeeds. Many jets have a Maximum operating Mach limit. Vmo would not change with altitude, but the IAS limit associated with that Mach limit will continually decrease as altitude increases. Eventually that Vmo (IAS) gets down to Vstall, and that is the "coffin corner" in a previous post. BT |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|